|Jimmy Carter knows no limits in his war against the Jews. Seen here sucking up to arch Hamas terrorist Meshal|
I've been wondering for some
time why the Clintons became highly critical of Israel? Of course for Hilary bashing Israel came with Obama's job, but her husband also did an about turn from being friendly towards Israel towards lambasting its prime minister Netanyahu and casting race tainted slurs on Jews based on their ethnicity:
Clinton said Arabs are the most pro-peace Israelis; then the Sabras, the Jewish Israelis born there; and then the Ashkenazi, the European Jews who came to Israel around the time of the country’s founding.
"The most anti-peace are the ultra-religious, who believe they're supposed to keep Judea and Samaria, and the settler groups, and what you might call the territorialists, the people who just showed up lately and they're not encumbered by the historical record,” Clinton said.
"That's what happened. Every American needs to know this. That's how we got to where we are," he noted. "The real cynics believe that the Netanyahu's government's continued call for negotiations over borders and such means that he's just not going to give up the West Bank."
However, Natan Sharansky, one of those Soviet immigrants, Clinton said, "who just showed up lately" and who Clinton presumably thinks does not want peace, said in response to CBSNews: "I am particularly disappointed by the president's casual use of inappropriate stereotypes about Israelis, dividing their views on peace based on ethnic origins."
What made Clinton change his tune from this?
Clinton has already publicly blamed Arafat for his failure to respond to Israeli peace proposals at Camp David, and instead returning to Ramallah to start a terror war against the Jewish State.
Has that whiff of Arab oil money which has corrupted political, diplomatic and academic life in the USA and Britain also descended on the Clinton family? How much influence does $2 billions buy?
The next time a Clinton opens his or her mouth think about just how much money from Arab tyrants flows into the family coffers. And when in the run up to new US elections Clinton proffers support for Israel, remember that Obama did likewise before he was elected President.
As for ex-president Carter his lifelong activism against the Jewish People and Israel can be first seen in his promoting of antisemitism in his 1950s preachings to Sunday school. Carter may have benefited enormously from Arab oil money but that is probably a sweetener for him in his life long crusade against Jews:
It’s hard for us to even visualize the prejudice against gentiles when Christ came on earth. If a Jew married a gentile, that person was considered to be dead. … How would you characterize from a Jew’s point of view the uncircumcised? Non believer? And what? Unclean, what? They called them DOGS! That’s true.
That Yeshivah University could give an award to such a man is beyond surprising.
The current wave of invective by academics in Europe and America towards Israel although owed not
a little to that ancient hatred of Jews, also owes much to half a century's worth of Arab countries undermining of western institutions through their oil wealth. Whole university departments are paid for by countries such as Qatar (eg Durham University) and Saudi Arabia (Georgetown University).
Any research on Islam and the Middle East is seen through a crooked prism, distorted by those who hold the purse strings. Of course the Universities involved deny that the money brings influence. Who are they kidding?
That miniscule democracy of Israel no larger than New Jersey and containing just 6 million Jews surrounded by hundreds of millions of Arabs seeking its death at every opportunity has had little chance to be understood in the West.
This is especially so since Russia and its Arab allies hit on the scheme to invent a people more tiny than Israel, the Palestinian Arabs. There never was a Palestinian people, and they mostly identify themselves with Egypt Saudi Arabia or Jordan and hold the passports of those countries. Yet the duped massed will never know that, in the face of a media beholden to the Arab message whether through financial interests
in the Arab world such as Reuters-Thompson and CNN or the loathsome BBC.
For example when he was Pres Clinton praised Israel for commitment to peace, yet afterwards said Israel
is the problem.
The Clinton Foundation is of course bathed in Arab money, as is Carter's. The Clintons have grown personally very rich on Arab oil money.
And now the emails are revealing that Mrs Clinton's frequent attacks on Israel when Obama's Sec of State were linked not just to Obama's hatred of Israel but her anti-Israel Jewish advisor Sid Blumenthal.
He regularly forwarded emails from his Israel baiting son Max to Mrs Clinton when not personally bashingIsrael himself.
So why does the MSM never deal with the foreign and malign lobby carried out by America's Arab enemies, but instead constantly harp about the homegrown AIPAC that lobbies on behalf of US ally Israel?
We're back to money and the old hatred of anti semitism something Obama himself is only too happy to promote:
Murmuring about “money” and “lobbying” and “foreign interests” who seek to drag America into war is a direct attempt to play the dual-loyalty card. It’s the kind of dark, nasty stuff we might expect to hear at a white power rally, not from the President of the United States—and it’s gotten so blatant that even many of us who are generally sympathetic to the administration, and even this deal, have been shaken by it.As Obama attempts to pass his disastrous nuclear surrender to Iran no holds are barred even antisemitic slurs.
Is Obama looking forwards to his post presidency? If so he should remember that Arabs do not see black people as equals, even using the term 'Slave' ('Abd') to denote them. The Saudis and other Arab countries are importing slaves from Africa at this very moment.
The Arab oil pickings for Obama might not be as profound as those Carter and the Clintons have enjoyed.